Its not a bad thing! iF u can tell the details and art seems sharp when it's far away - you're doing good! I don't see any problems in the artwork u posted. Its blurry in the movement, which is the right thing, wholesome it looks good and contrasted enough. You dont have to make ur artwork "unfinished" to add that paintlike feel, it's already giving that idea and is not too blurry!
thank you so much!
Any takes on how to balance or go to an extreme or take advantage of like paintlike, or impressionist, or bluriness of an image? sometimes I think my art is a bit too blurry than id like to be, unlike other art which tends to be more clean/clearer, but i do notice some artist were able to pull off the paintlike feel on their art, but this seems to be because of the "incompleteness" of their work, like the more incomplete or impressionist or implied the details are, the more my mind or creativeity is enhancing the image since its making up the details that are lacking in the art, but when i do it for myself, i tend to think its a bit blurry or muddy or dirty than id like it to be anyone have thoughts on implied/painterly art vs soft/blurred or muddy? my recent art is in here, it looks clear when zoomed out but when i zoom in, its a bit blurry/muddy than id like it to be, i dont know if its a good or bad thing I dont know what to think about it Also some genereal feedback would be appreciated
